Odpowiedz w temacie  [ Posty: 1 ] 
t each separate Nike v. ad 
Autor Wiadomość

Rejestracja: 12 wrz 2018, 09:38
Posty: 42
Odpowiedz z cytatem
Nike further contended that Dekovic, Dolce, and Miner began plotting their departure in April 2014, pitching their studio plan (one that Nike claimed was merely a knockoff Nike Air Max 95 Femme of its existing design studio) to Adidas and subsequently bringing Adidas information about Nike's plans for the next several years in connection with its running, sportswear and soccer lines. In return, adidas reportedly – in an attempt to overthrow the giant – offered them lucrative employment contracts to jump ship Nike Air Max 90 Womens from Nike.
Adidas also, according to Nike’s complaint, agreed to provide Dekovic, Dolce, and Miner with legal support and cover the legal fees "if ever Nike discovered their disloyalty and deception."
In response to Nike’s downright damning allegations, the three designers filed counterclaims against Nike, accusing the company of creating a "culture of distrust and intimidation," Nike Air Max 95 Womens which caused them to seek employment elsewhere; hacking their phones, emails and social media accounts, and filing this "meritless" lawsuit www.josielloyd.co.uk purely as a "publicity stunt."
That notably ugly suit was resolved easily enough by June 2015 – six months after its initiation – “through a confidential settlement” on the eve of the scheduled deposition of Nike CEO Mark Parker. Dekovic, Dolce, and Miner have since begun work at adidas, which opened its Brooklyn Creator www.ronbell.co.uk Farm in the summer of 2017.
It is here, in what Highsnobiety’s Jonathan Sawyer called “a fairly secret warehouse location in Greenpoint,” that “you will find a relatively small conglomerate of designers from all across the globe, whose job is to ‘create culture,’ according to Dolce, [who is now] a VP and creative director at adidas.”This legal battle was, nonetheless, a significant one. Considered in connection with the Nike Air Max 2017 Womens oft-ongoing patent battles between Nike and adidas, it provided a rare look at the profundity Nike Air Max 2015 Womens of the contention between the titans of the world’s $250 billion-plus sportswear industry.
It was also a noteworthy reminder that each separate Nike v. adidas legal battle (or vice versa) is merely an individual part of a much larger power play, one that plainly establishes that if there is a modern-day rivalry of the Adidas NMD Womens greatest proportions, Nike vs. adidas is certainly in the running for a top spot – one “stolen” employee and/or "copied" knitted shoe at a time.Almost 20 years ago, Nike set out to craft a shoe that delivers peak performance for athletes while reducing manufacturing waste in the process. In reality, what it created was a war that would give rise to hundreds of thousands – if not millions – of dollars in costs and stretch over years and continents. Inside Nike’s ultra-secretive Beaverton, Oregon headquarters, this Nike Air Max 90 Womens shoe took the form of years of intensive research and development, and expenses that CEO Mark Parker thought the $86 billion sportswear giant might never recoup.
But then in February 2012, Nike debuted what was deemed to be the most momentous innovation in the fiercely competitive, and multibillion-dollar-earning sneaker market Nike Air Max Vision Womens in years. It was Flyknit.


31 paź 2018, 07:26
Zgłoś ten post
Wyświetl profil
Wyświetl posty nie starsze niż:  Sortuj wg  
Odpowiedz w temacie   [ Posty: 1 ] 

Kto jest online

Użytkownicy przeglądający to forum: Obecnie na forum nie ma żadnego zarejestrowanego użytkownika i 2 gości


Możesz tworzyć nowe tematy
Możesz odpowiadać w tematach
Nie możesz zmieniać swoich postów
Nie możesz usuwać swoich postów
Nie możesz dodawać załączników

Szukaj:
Przejdź do:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software